At 03:54 PM 1/25/2007, you wrote:
> > Another thing to consider is:
>heh, silly mail client :). Another thing to consider is this:
>Though it's "Not recommended for production use", I've heard people still use
>it in production environments.
Falcon doesn't currently support RI. And like Innodb, it requires
its own table space so it too may get fragmented.
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/falcon/en/se-falcon-createdb.html and will likely
require packing (sweeping?) from time to time. It would be nice to see some
benchmarks compared to InnoDb and MyISAM.