--- Winn Johnston <winn_johnston@stripped> wrote:
> --- Jimmy Guerrero <jguerrero@stripped> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Just to make sure we separate the two...
> > > mysql cluster that preforms reads on all the
> > slaves, and writes only on
> > the master.
> > The above can be used to describe a typical use
> > for MySQL Replication.
> > In a MySQL Cluster there is no need to
> > your reads and writes.
> > Thanks,
> > Jimmy Guerrero
> > MySQL, Inc
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Winn Johnston
> > [mailto:winn_johnston@stripped]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 3:26 PM
> > > To: mysql@stripped
> > > Subject: mysql + LVS
> > >
> > > How stable has it become to run an instance of
> > mysql ontop of
> > > a LVS cluster to produce a massively parrallel
> > system to be
> > > used for huge databases?
> > >
> > > Back in the day i remember tyring to do it with
> > mosix, not
> > > sure where they are now a days. but either way i
> > am looking
> > > for some current information on the subject.
> > >
> > > I know this differs from the idea that you can
> > have a mysql
> > > cluster that preforms reads on all the slaves,
> > writes
> > > only on the master.
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > winn johnston
> ok so LVS is not what i am looking for. I have been
> reading about some software hacks that allow mysql
> use shared memory spread out over a few machines.
> Huge database, over 7 million records. And a high
> ratio of writes vs reads. Idealy i would like to
> the entire database in RAM. Does anyone have any
> experience running a database this big? can anyone
> offer a suitalbe setup? I have taken a look at the
> wikipedia setup
after talking to a few people on the #mysql irc
someone suggested using NFS to create a ramfs to get
100GB+ RAM shared memory to load the entire database
into the RAM. Can anyone offer any Pros or Cons to
this setup, drawing from personal expierence?
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around