Just to make sure we separate the two...
> mysql cluster that preforms reads on all the slaves, and writes only on
The above can be used to describe a typical use case for MySQL Replication.
In a MySQL Cluster there is no need to load-balance your reads and writes.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Winn Johnston [mailto:winn_johnston@stripped]
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 3:26 PM
> To: mysql@stripped
> Subject: mysql + LVS
> How stable has it become to run an instance of mysql ontop of
> a LVS cluster to produce a massively parrallel system to be
> used for huge databases?
> Back in the day i remember tyring to do it with mosix, not
> sure where they are now a days. but either way i am looking
> for some current information on the subject.
> I know this differs from the idea that you can have a mysql
> cluster that preforms reads on all the slaves, and writes
> only on the master.
> winn johnston
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
> around http://mail.yahoo.com
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe: