List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Paul DuBois Date:November 30 1999 12:57am
Subject:Re: umask for bind on LOCAL socket
View as plain text  
At 11:32 AM +1100 1999/11/30, Benjamin Low wrote:
>Paul DuBois wrote:
>>  The MySQL grant tables provide access control already.
>
>Yes, but I was wondering just why the umask is explicitly set to 0. i.e.
>was this done for compatibility/portability reasons? for ease-of-use
>reasons? or something else? I'd have thought you'd just leave it alone,
>and let the user decide via their environment's umask.

Which user?

-- 
Paul DuBois, paul@stripped
Thread
privileges for GET_LOCK?Benjamin Low19 Nov
  • Re: privileges for GET_LOCK?Paul DuBois19 Nov
  • umask for bind on LOCAL socketBenjamin Low30 Nov
    • Re: umask for bind on LOCAL socketPaul DuBois30 Nov
  • Re: umask for bind on LOCAL socketBenjamin Low30 Nov
    • Re: umask for bind on LOCAL socketPaul DuBois30 Nov
  • Re: umask for bind on LOCAL socketBenjamin Low30 Nov