| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Paul DuBois | Date: | November 30 1999 12:19am |
| Subject: | Re: umask for bind on LOCAL socket | ||
| View as plain text | |||
At 11:01 AM +1100 1999/11/30, Benjamin Low wrote: >I see that mysql-3.22.27 sets the umask to 0 before binding to a local >(UNIX) socket, then resets the umask. Why? > >I'd like to see the socket permissions be restricted, to provide another >layer of protection - much as TCP wrappers do in the AF_INET world. The >(UNIX) filesystem has a pretty good permissions system, why not use it? The MySQL grant tables provide access control already. If you want different behavior, of course, you can just change the source. -- Paul DuBois, paul@stripped
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • privileges for GET_LOCK? | Benjamin Low | 19 Nov |
| • Re: privileges for GET_LOCK? | Paul DuBois | 19 Nov |
| • umask for bind on LOCAL socket | Benjamin Low | 30 Nov |
| • Re: umask for bind on LOCAL socket | Paul DuBois | 30 Nov |
| • Re: umask for bind on LOCAL socket | Benjamin Low | 30 Nov |
| • Re: umask for bind on LOCAL socket | Paul DuBois | 30 Nov |
| • Re: umask for bind on LOCAL socket | Benjamin Low | 30 Nov |
