>>>>> "Joshua" == Joshua Chamas <joshua@stripped> writes:
Joshua> indrek siitan wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> > Just wondering if the maximum table size is 2GB on windoze
>> > NT? I tried adding table options (3.23.5a) of avg_row_length,
>> > max_rows, and so on ... but I still get cut off at about 2GB.
>>
>> unfortunately yes. this is not directly a mysql limit - but mysql
>> keeps all the data in a single file and 2GB is a file size limit
>> on NT (as well as on many other operating systems).
>>
>> Rgds,
>> Tfr
>>
Joshua> I went around with the mysql developers about this fallacy.
Joshua> WinNT does not have a 2G file size limit. I'm looking at a 4G
Joshua> file right not on a WinNT 4.0 box. Something must be wrong
Joshua> with mysql.
See my previous mail; This will be fixed in 3.23.7.
Regards,
Monty
| Thread |
|---|
| • Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Chris L. Smith | 19 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | sinisa | 19 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Steve Ruby | 19 Nov |
| • RE: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Matthew Clark | 19 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Steve Ruby | 19 Nov |
| • RE: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | sinisa | 20 Nov |
| • 64 Bit ext2, Reiser FS, and Solaris on Intel | Bruce Ward | 20 Nov |
| • RE: 64 Bit ext2, Reiser FS, and Solaris on Intel | Kolb Norbert | 20 Nov |
| • Re: 64 Bit ext2, Reiser FS, and Solaris on Intel | Matthew Kirkwood | 21 Nov |
| • Re: 64 Bit ext2, Reiser FS, and Solaris on Intel | sinisa | 21 Nov |
| • Re: 64 Bit ext2, Reiser FS, and Solaris on Intel | Matthew Kirkwood | 21 Nov |
| • Re: 64 Bit ext2, Reiser FS, and Solaris on Intel | sinisa | 22 Nov |
| • 64 Bit ext2, Reiser FS, and Solaris on Intel | Bruce Ward | 21 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | sinisa | 20 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Michael Widenius | 26 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Steve Ruby | 20 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Michael Widenius | 26 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Steve Ruby | 22 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Christopher E. Brown | 22 Nov |
| • RE: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | indrek siitan | 19 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Joshua Chamas | 19 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Michael Widenius | 26 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Steve Ruby | 19 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Steve Ruby | 19 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Vivek Khera | 19 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Steve Ruby | 19 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Faisal Nasim | 19 Nov |
| • RE: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Jim Keijser | 19 Nov |
| • RE: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Peter Strömberg | 22 Nov |
| • RE: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Christopher E. Brown | 22 Nov |
| • RE: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Peter Strömberg | 22 Nov |
| • Re: Are tables limited to 2GB on Win NT? | Tonu Samuel | 20 Nov |
| • RE: 64 Bit ext2, Reiser FS, and Solaris on Intel | John Foley | 23 Nov |