From: mwilliams
Date: February 17 2006 6:22pm
Subject: RE: (mysqldump)  Serial output. . .?
List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/194962
Message-Id: <200602171222.AA497025200@mgreg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Dirk,

My fear is that the output I must massage won't be 100% consistent across different Linux 
distros.  It would make me feel all "warm and fuzzy" if I knew I could count on a format that 
would simply give me what I needed when I needed (pie in the sky, right?).

Anywho, I probbaly will just end up 'parsing' and formatting the output.

Thanks,
Michael

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Dirk Bremer" <Dirk.Bremer@stripped>
Date:  Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:51:20 -0600

>Rather than changing the function of the mysqldump program, why not
>massage its output to your specifications.
>
>Dirk Bremer - Senior Systems Engineer - ESS/AMS - NISC Lake St. Louis MO
>- USA Central Time Zone
>636-755-2652 fax 636-755-2503
>
>dirk.bremer@stripped
>www.nisc.coop 
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mwilliams [mailto:mwilliams@stripped] 
>> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 14:44
>> To: SGreen@stripped
>> Cc: mysql@stripped
>> Subject: RE: (mysqldump) Serial output. . .?
>> 
>> Shawn,
>> 
>> I'd actually considered such, but I was hoping for it to 
>> already be present.  I'm currently on a 
>> tight deadline to finish a project I'm working on so devoting 
>> time to getting 'mysqldump' 
>> stable enough to then propagate across corporate servers in 
>> such a short period is not very 
>> likely.
>> 
>> As far as your comment regarding replication vs syncing, I 
>> have noticed the same thing.  And 
>> it really blows my mind that so few people are interested in 
>> two-way syncing (e.g. I'll give 
>> you mine and you give me yours).  This seems to be a 
>> necessity, and the very foundation for 
>> many corporate applications, yet it also apears that most are 
>> aparently proprietary.
>> 
>> Anyway, thanks again for your input.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Michael
>> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>> From: SGreen@stripped
>> Date:  Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:31:04 -0500
>> 
>> >My suggestion: Modify the source of mysqldump yourself. 
>> >
>> >After all, it is open source. Make sure you adhere to any and all 
>> >licensing requirements and copyright notices and you will 
>> keep yourself 
>> >out of any legal trouble. 
>> >
>> >For the vast majority of users, replication is a better 
>> solution than what 
>> >you propose so the changes you propose haven't been 
>> discussed at all. If 
>> >others would like to have your changes, perhaps you would consider 
>> >synching your mods with the main development tree and 
>> releasing them to 
>> >the community?
>> >
>> >Shawn Green
>> >Database Administrator
>> >Unimin Corporation - Spruce Pine
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> MySQL General Mailing List
>> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
>> To unsubscribe:    
>> http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=dirk.bremer@stripped
>> 
>> 
>