| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Ady Wicaksono | Date: | October 14 2005 8:52am |
| Subject: | Re: default table type = innodb is stable?? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Currently i have 4 Gbyte RAM and RH 9 Linux using InnoDB and yes, it's stable :) Hiu Yen Onn wrote: > hi, > > i have a machine with 6G memory, loaded with RHEL4. now, my question > is mysql support innodb as the default table type? will be stable > running RHEL4? > i saw /usr/share/mysql/my-innodb-heavy-4G.cnf file, then, i replace > the existing one (/etc/my.cnf). but, it failed to start the mysql > server. please advise. thanks? >
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • default table type = innodb is stable?? | Hiu Yen Onn | 14 Oct |
| • Re: default table type = innodb is stable?? | Ady Wicaksono | 14 Oct |
| • Re: default table type = innodb is stable?? | Hiu Yen Onn | 15 Oct |
| • Re: default table type = innodb is stable?? | Hiu Yen Onn | 15 Oct |
| • Re: default table type = innodb is stable?? | Jigal van Hemert | 15 Oct |
| • Re: default table type = innodb is stable?? | Hiu Yen Onn | 16 Oct |
| • RE: default table type = innodb is stable?? | Richard Dale | 16 Oct |
| • Re: default table type = innodb is stable?? | Hiu Yen Onn | 17 Oct |
| • Re: default table type = innodb is stable?? | Gleb Paharenko | 15 Oct |
