| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Alec.Cawley | Date: | September 19 2005 2:09pm |
| Subject: | Re: Circular Replication | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Sid Lane <jakes.dad@stripped> wrote on 19/09/2005 15:02:58: > stupid ?: > > what keeps them from getting caught in a write loop? turning off > log_slave_updates? > > I had never thought of this but is has intriging possibilities... Each update is marked with the unique server id of the server which originated it. When the update returns to its originating server, it is dropped instead of being executed. That is why every server must have a unique id. Alec
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Circular Replication | Jeff | 16 Sep |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Dan Nelson | 16 Sep |
| • RE: Circular Replication | Jeff | 16 Sep |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Devananda | 16 Sep |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Stefan Kuhn | 16 Sep |
| • Re: Circular Replication | RaphaĆ«l 'SurcouF' Bordet | 27 Oct |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Stefan Kuhn | 27 Oct |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Jigal van Hemert | 27 Oct |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Devananda | 28 Oct |
| • RE: Circular Replication | Jeff McKeon | 16 Sep |
| • RE: Circular Replication | Jeff | 16 Sep |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Devananda | 16 Sep |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Sid Lane | 19 Sep |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Alec.Cawley | 19 Sep |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Sid Lane | 19 Sep |
| • RE: Circular Replication | Jeff | 20 Sep |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Devananda | 20 Sep |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Bruce Dembecki | 21 Sep |
| • RE: Circular Replication | Jeff | 20 Sep |
| • RE: Circular Replication | Jeff | 21 Sep |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Bruce Dembecki | 22 Sep |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Hank | 26 Sep |
| • Re: Circular Replication | Hank | 26 Sep |
