List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Lorenzo De Vito Date:September 13 2005 8:09pm
Subject:Re: cluster or replication
View as plain text  
This isn't a constraint, this is a limit, the goal is to have a 
bi-directional replication but I've not found solutions to my problem 
using mysql. I've a control access system with 9 minitowers which 
controls people access via RFID, each minitower is provided with linux 
and mysql synchronized with a main server, each machine is identical to 
others and can alive without connecting to main server if any problem 
hardware or software close the connection with the rest of the network 
and align again datas if connection go up, something like a survivor 
system. So now you can understand that with this scenario mysql actual 
replication MASTER/SLAVE isn't a solution. (Perhaps I'll think to modify 
sources :)) )
> The only constraint you'll have here is that there can only be one MASTER
> that has to accept all the INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE (or anything that will
> make the data change).  All other nodes would be considered SLAVEs and
> be READ-ONLY.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> a
>
>   

Thread
cluster or replicationLorenzo De Vito12 Sep
  • RE: cluster or replicationCory Robin13 Sep
RE: cluster or replicationAlan Williamson13 Sep
  • Re: cluster or replicationCory Robin13 Sep
  • Re: cluster or replicationLorenzo De Vito13 Sep