| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Matthew Lenz | Date: | September 10 2005 11:20pm |
| Subject: | Re: default my.cnf vs huge.cnf nearly same performance with | ||
| View as plain text | |||
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gleb Paharenko" <gleb.paharenko@stripped> > Hello. > >> huge.cnf example. What about that thread_concurrency setting in >> huge.cnf.. it doesn't seem to show up in a 'show variables' when using >> it.. is it deprecated? > > In the manual it is meant that thead_concurrency is used on Solaris. > In the source files I've seen that thread_concurrency supported on those > platforms which have thr_setconcurrency function. See: > configure.in (AC_CHECK_FUNCS macros) > http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/server-system-variables.html Makes sense. Its fine that its ignored. I'm still curious as to why I'm not seeing better performance from the config that give mysql more resources to play with :(
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • default my.cnf vs huge.cnf nearly same performance withsql-bench/run-all-tests | Matthew Lenz | 9 Sep |
| • Re: default my.cnf vs huge.cnf nearly same performance with | Gleb Paharenko | 10 Sep |
| • Re: default my.cnf vs huge.cnf nearly same performance with | Matthew Lenz | 10 Sep |
| • Re: default my.cnf vs huge.cnf nearly same performance with sql-bench/run-all-tests | Daniel | 11 Sep |
| • Re: default my.cnf vs huge.cnf nearly same performance with sql-bench/run-all-tests | Matthew Lenz | 12 Sep |
| • Re: default my.cnf vs huge.cnf nearly same performance with sql-bench/run-all-tests | Daniel | 12 Sep |
| • Re: default my.cnf vs huge.cnf nearly same performancewith sql-bench/run-all-tests | Matthew Lenz | 12 Sep |
