Hello.
> And I guess you also refer to the strange behavior that it's different when
> adding an ORDER BY or GROUP BY, right?
Yes, in my opinion, ORDER BY shouldn't change the column's type.
"M DR" <dhmderuitersql@stripped> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your answers,
>
> What is according to you the bug? Should it always return a string format
> value? Or should it always return a system.byte[] format value?
>
> And I guess you also refer to the strange behavior that it's different when
> adding an ORDER BY or GROUP BY, right?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Martin
>
--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.NET http://www.ensita.net/
__ ___ ___ ____ __
/ |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ / Gleb Paharenko
/ /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ Gleb.Paharenko@stripped
/_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ MySQL AB / Ensita.NET
<___/ www.mysql.com
