| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Eamon Daly | Date: | August 24 2005 4:40pm |
| Subject: | MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter table | ||
| View as plain text | |||
We have a table containing just one column that we use for unique IDs: CREATE TABLE `id_sequence` ( `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) TYPE=MyISAM Watching 'SHOW FULL PROCESSLIST' and reading the slow query log shows the occasional backlog of locks. Has anyone found significant speed increases or better concurrency by switching over to InnoDB for such a table? ____________________________________________________________ Eamon Daly
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter table | Eamon Daly | 24 Aug |
| • Re: MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter table | SGreen | 24 Aug |
| • Re: MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter table | Eamon Daly | 24 Aug |
| • Re: MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter table | SGreen | 24 Aug |
| • Re: MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter table | Gleb Paharenko | 24 Aug |
| • Re: MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter table | Daniel Kasak | 25 Aug |
