List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Eamon Daly Date:August 24 2005 4:40pm
Subject:MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter table
View as plain text  
We have a table containing just one column that we use for
unique IDs:

CREATE TABLE `id_sequence` (
  `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
  PRIMARY KEY  (`id`)
) TYPE=MyISAM 

Watching 'SHOW FULL PROCESSLIST' and reading the slow query
log shows the occasional backlog of locks. Has anyone found
significant speed increases or better concurrency by
switching over to InnoDB for such a table?

____________________________________________________________
Eamon Daly

Thread
MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter tableEamon Daly24 Aug
  • Re: MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter tableSGreen24 Aug
    • Re: MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter tableEamon Daly24 Aug
      • Re: MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter tableSGreen24 Aug
  • Re: MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter tableGleb Paharenko24 Aug
  • Re: MyISAM vs. InnoDB for an AUTO_INCREMENT counter tableDaniel Kasak25 Aug