| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Peter Normann | Date: | May 26 2005 7:35am |
| Subject: | RE: InnoDB to MyISAM | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Martijn Tonies <mailto:m.tonies@stripped> wrote: > Nevertheless, foreign key constraints belong in the database, not in > your application... If you have foreign keys (your wording), you need > foreign key constraints. Period. Plain and simple. No discussion :-) Foreign keys are foreign keys. Constraints are constraints. Foreign key constraints are... well, you do the math. So, in your opinion, MySql was never really a relational database until whatever version enforcing refential constraints was released? Peter Normann
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • InnoDB to MyISAM | Scott Purcell | 25 May |
| • Re: InnoDB to MyISAM | DBA) | 25 May |
| • Re: InnoDB to MyISAM | Rafal Kedziorski | 25 May |
| • Re: InnoDB to MyISAM | Jeremiah Gowdy | 25 May |
| • Re: InnoDB to MyISAM | Martijn Tonies | 25 May |
| • Re: InnoDB to MyISAM | Jeremiah Gowdy | 26 May |
| • Re: InnoDB to MyISAM | mfatene | 26 May |
| • Re: InnoDB to MyISAM | Martijn Tonies | 26 May |
| • Re: InnoDB to MyISAM | Jeremiah Gowdy | 26 May |
| • Re: InnoDB to MyISAM | Jeremiah Gowdy | 26 May |
| • Re: InnoDB to MyISAM | Martijn Tonies | 26 May |
| • RE: InnoDB to MyISAM | Peter Normann | 26 May |
| • Re: InnoDB to MyISAM | Jeremiah Gowdy | 27 May |
| • Re: InnoDB to MyISAM | Martijn Tonies | 26 May |
| • Re: InnoDB to MyISAM | DBA) | 26 May |
