| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | David Lloyd | Date: | April 18 2005 11:07pm |
| Subject: | Re: InnoDB Performance | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Eko and all, > >The MyIsam storage engine is a non transactional engine and InnoDb is > >a transactional engine. That is the main difference. So I think the > >MyIsam engine should be faster. However, some file systems that have journals are faster than non journalling file system. It's not always that clear cut. I've just switched a number of big customer databases to InnoDB and noone's noticed any difference - if anything it's going faster. DSL ( mysql, sql )
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • InnoDB Performance | Marcin Lewandowski | 12 Apr |
| • Re: InnoDB Performance | Reto Breitenmoser | 12 Apr |
| • Re: InnoDB Performance | kernel | 12 Apr |
| • Re: InnoDB Performance | Marcin Lewandowski | 12 Apr |
| • Re: InnoDB Performance | Daniel Kasak | 13 Apr |
| • Re: InnoDB Performance | Gleb Paharenko | 13 Apr |
| • Re: InnoDB Performance | Marcin Lewandowski | 12 Apr |
| • Re: InnoDB Performance | Gary Richardson | 13 Apr |
| • Re: InnoDB Performance | Heikki Tuuri | 13 Apr |
| • Re: InnoDB Performance | Marcin Lewandowski | 13 Apr |
| • Re: InnoDB Performance | Eko Budiharto | 18 Apr |
| • Re: InnoDB Performance | Reto Breitenmoser | 18 Apr |
| • Re: InnoDB Performance | David Lloyd | 19 Apr |
| • Re: InnoDB Performance | Jigal van Hemert | 19 Apr |
