List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:James Black Date:April 1 2005 9:50pm
Subject:re: stored procedure slower than not using stored procedure?
View as plain text  
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I am curious if this should be the norm, that the stored procedure took
879 ms when I called it 9 times, with slightly different values, and the
non-stored procedure test took 512ms with also slightly different values.

I am using jdk1.5 and mysql 5.0.3 on Solaris 8.

Thanx.

- --
"Love is mutual self-giving that ends in self-recovery." Fulton Sheen
James Black    james@stripped
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCTcI+ikQgpVn8xrARAic6AJ0QiAlSYq/MGpNNLj7sEfHabKUkPQCdEjIO
Ccq+YOUiTNeXI/wF0xar+fM=
=namZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thread
re: stored procedure slower than not using stored procedure?James Black1 Apr