List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Michael Satterwhite Date:March 31 2005 3:06pm
Subject:Re: license question
View as plain text  
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

gunmuse@stripped wrote:
| MySql loses money from many vendors on this very point.  Of which they do
| not budge.
|
| We have a Point of Sale software company who can distribute Oracle
cheaper.
| They only require a percentage of the final product price that their
product
| is packaged with.  When the company explained they would rather use
MySql an
| pay them the same rates MySql refused.

I'm sure there's a good answer for this, but I must be dense.

In this scenario, why did you go to Oracle instead of PostgreSQL?

	Oracle = Pay percentage of final price
	PostgreSql = Free

The times I've used PostgreSql, it's seemed a good product. Am I missing
something?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCTBHmjeziQOokQnARAlPWAJ48vFaVNuIJqwJy7MeuELQNwHXN2QCcDy0m
p13BPCbmEyYZbwS1cA1U9RE=
=PKoE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thread
license questionPat Ballard31 Mar
  • Re: license questionvalentin_nils31 Mar
  • RE: license questionDaevid Vincent31 Mar
    • RE: license questiongunmuse31 Mar
      • RE: license questionDaevid Vincent31 Mar
      • Re: license questionMichael Satterwhite31 Mar
    • Re: license questionMark Matthews31 Mar
  • Re: license questionGleb Paharenko31 Mar
Re: license questionPat Ballard31 Mar
RE: license questionSST - Adelaide)31 Mar
RE: license questionPat Ballard31 Mar