List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Michael Stembridge Date:March 4 2005 11:21pm
Subject:mysqldump vs. 'mysql [db] > file.sql'
View as plain text  
mysqldump vs. 'mysql [db] > file.sql'

I stumbled across the latter method early on but notice that most folks
suggest using mysqldump instead; are there performance benefits with using
mysqldump, or some other reason?   

The same question could be applied to using mysqlimport vs. 'mysql [db] <
tablename.sql'.  

Thoughts? 
Thread
mysqldump vs. 'mysql [db] > file.sql'Michael Stembridge5 Mar
  • Re: mysqldump vs. 'mysql [db] > file.sql'Dan Nelson5 Mar