Many data centers do not allow customers to install their own UPS inside
the rack. I am not sure if this is the case with Wikipedia, but it is
definitely the case at the data center we are hosted in. I would love
to shove one in after reading the horror stories at Livejournal and now
Wikipedia.
Greg
greg@stripped
Meetup.com
Daniel Kasak wrote:
> Scott Haneda wrote:
>
>> There is a thread over at /. about WikiMedia being out due to a power
>> outage
>> <http://slashdot.org/articles/05/02/22/0151213.shtml?tid=95>
>>
>> MySql is getting bashed pretty hard in some cases as apparently, in power
>> failures, you get database corruption. (this is all from the posts,
>> not my
>> opinion at all, I am asking only to learn more) Also, it is mentioned the
>> MySql devs just do not have data corruption from power failure a high
>> priority.
>>
>> Many are leaning on Postgres. For me, MySql has never let me down
>> (Knock on
>> PSU) but I have to ask, for more data on this matter. I run MySql on
>> OS X,
>> I sometimes have to reboot, it comes back up fine, I do however, do
>> nothing
>> special to shut down mysql, should I be?
>>
>>
> There are certainly some people who have nothing better to do than
> preach the benefits of Postgres over MySQL on Slashdot.
> The simple fact is that no matter how fancy your software is, if your
> computer experiences a power outage, you can't *insist* that one
> particular application somehow protect your data from the fate of
> everything else on your computer.
>
> We have a UPS connected to our 2 servers. The Linux server is running
> apcupsd and controlling the Win2k server ( also running apcupsd in slave
> mode ). Both servers are connected via a crossover cable to each other (
> so we don't have to put the network switches on the UPS ).
>
> If WikiMedia can't implement something at least as good as the above,
> then how can they or anyone else point the finger at MySQL for data
> corruption? The mind boggles over what they expect.
>
> Having said that, our MySQL server has experienced a power 'issue' ( my
> boss tripped over the power cord coming from the UPS ). We both turned
> white :) But MySQL started up OK, rolled back a transaction or 2, and
> continued on it's way.
>
> There's nothing like a UPS though. Or better yet, a UPS, daily backups,
> and a transaction log.
>
| Thread |
|---|
| • wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Scott Haneda | 22 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | DebugasRu | 22 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Peter Wilm | 22 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Daniel Kasak | 22 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Greg Whalin | 22 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Daniel Kasak | 22 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Greg Whalin | 23 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | DebugasRu | 24 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Rich Lafferty | 24 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Greg Whalin | 24 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Rich Lafferty | 24 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Greg Whalin | 24 Feb |
| • Re[2]: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | DebugasRu | 24 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Heikki Tuuri | 22 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Greg Whalin | 22 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Jochem van Dieten | 23 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Heikki Tuuri | 23 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Heikki Tuuri | 23 Feb |
| • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned | Heikki Tuuri | 23 Feb |