List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Greg Whalin Date:February 22 2005 10:49pm
Subject:Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentioned
View as plain text  
Many data centers do not allow customers to install their own UPS inside 
the rack.  I am not sure if this is the case with Wikipedia, but it is 
definitely the case at the data center we are hosted in.  I would love 
to shove one in after reading the horror stories at Livejournal and now 
Wikipedia.

Greg
greg@stripped
Meetup.com

Daniel Kasak wrote:
> Scott Haneda wrote:
> 
>> There is a thread over at /. about WikiMedia being out due to a power 
>> outage
>> <http://slashdot.org/articles/05/02/22/0151213.shtml?tid=95>
>>
>> MySql is getting bashed pretty hard in some cases as apparently, in power
>> failures, you get database corruption.  (this is all from the posts, 
>> not my
>> opinion at all, I am asking only to learn more) Also, it is mentioned the
>> MySql devs just do not have data corruption from power failure a high
>> priority.
>>
>> Many are leaning on Postgres.  For me, MySql has never let me down 
>> (Knock on
>> PSU) but I have to ask, for more data on this matter.  I run MySql on 
>> OS X,
>> I sometimes have to reboot, it comes back up fine, I do however, do 
>> nothing
>> special to shut down mysql, should I be?
>>  
>>
> There are certainly some people who have nothing better to do than 
> preach the benefits of Postgres over MySQL on Slashdot.
> The simple fact is that no matter how fancy your software is, if your 
> computer experiences a power outage, you can't *insist* that one 
> particular application somehow protect your data from the fate of 
> everything else on your computer.
> 
> We have a UPS connected to our 2 servers. The Linux server is running 
> apcupsd and controlling the Win2k server ( also running apcupsd in slave 
> mode ). Both servers are connected via a crossover cable to each other ( 
> so we don't have to put the network switches on the UPS ).
> 
> If WikiMedia can't implement something at least as good as the above, 
> then how can they or anyone else point the finger at MySQL for data 
> corruption? The mind boggles over what they expect.
> 
> Having said that, our MySQL server has experienced a power 'issue' ( my 
> boss tripped over the power cord coming from the UPS ). We both turned 
> white :) But MySQL started up OK, rolled back a transaction or 2, and 
> continued on it's way.
> 
> There's nothing like a UPS though. Or better yet, a UPS, daily backups, 
> and a transaction log.
> 

Thread
wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedScott Haneda22 Feb
  • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedDebugasRu22 Feb
  • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedPeter Wilm22 Feb
  • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedDaniel Kasak22 Feb
    • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedGreg Whalin22 Feb
      • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedDaniel Kasak22 Feb
        • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedGreg Whalin23 Feb
        • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedDebugasRu24 Feb
          • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedRich Lafferty24 Feb
            • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedGreg Whalin24 Feb
              • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedRich Lafferty24 Feb
                • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedGreg Whalin24 Feb
              • Re[2]: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedDebugasRu24 Feb
Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedHeikki Tuuri22 Feb
  • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedGreg Whalin22 Feb
  • Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedJochem van Dieten23 Feb
Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedHeikki Tuuri23 Feb
Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedHeikki Tuuri23 Feb
Re: wikipedia down, slashdot covering, mysql mentionedHeikki Tuuri23 Feb