List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:mel list_php Date:February 15 2005 11:56am
Subject:Re: last_insert_id
View as plain text  
Yes that's what I mean I arranged to have single queries for the inserts.
For example I avoid doing a select on criteria to retrieve that id an then 
an update of this id.
thanks for help!!!


>From: Philippe Poelvoorde <philippe@stripped>
>Reply-To: "'mysql@stripped '" <mysql@stripped>
>To: mel list_php <list_php@stripped>
>CC: mysql@stripped
>Subject: Re: last_insert_id
>Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:50:40 +0000
>
>mel list_php wrote:
>>Hi!
>>
>>I have a database where several users can connect and input data.
>>
>>I managed to have my insert queries as atomic, but I was wondering about 
>>one special case: I make one insert, and retrieve the last id inserted by 
>>mysql because I need to update an other table with that id.
>>
>>- if one user inserts and retrieves the id, but between both one other has 
>>inserted something the id returned will be the right one?
>
>Last_insert_id() is consistent on a per-connection basis, meaning you don't 
>need to use lock (hopefullly !)
>http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/getting-unique-id.html
>
>btw, what do you mean by : "I managed to have my insert queries as atomic". 
>Because if you do : INSERT .... it's already suppose to be atomic.
>
>HIMH.
>
>--
>Philippe Poelvoorde
>COS Trading Ltd.

_________________________________________________________________
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

Thread
last_insert_idmel list_php15 Feb
  • Re: last_insert_idJohan Höök15 Feb
  • Re: last_insert_idAlec.Cawley15 Feb
  • Re: last_insert_idPhilippe Poelvoorde15 Feb
    • Re: last_insert_idmel list_php15 Feb
    • Re: last_insert_idmel list_php15 Feb
    • Re: last_insert_idmel list_php15 Feb