| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Nick Arnett | Date: | February 2 2005 5:11pm |
| Subject: | Re: Social Networking querys | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Peter Brawley wrote: >> is, there is some method to iterate in this relation to avoid joining >> the table in itself each time ? > > > Exactly the problem with trying to model an anything-goes network, a > "world of ends", in a relational model of a directed graph. I think > you need an XML layer in there, eg see > http://iswc2004.semanticweb.org/demos/03/. > XML isn't necessary and probably just makes it more complicated. As someone wrote, if you have a problem and decide to solve it with XML, now you have two problems. On the other hand, since the semantic web relies on graphs, approaches that work for it do apply... but unless interoperability matters, it's hard for me to imagine a good reason to bother with XML. Nick
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Social Networking querys | listsql listsql | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | Peter Brawley | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | Nick Arnett | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | Balazs Rauznitz | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | Nick Arnett | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | Michael Dykman | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | Bruce Douglas | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | Balazs Rauznitz | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | Bruce Douglas | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | Bruce Douglas | 2 Feb |
| • RE: Social Networking querys | Dathan Pattishall | 2 Feb |
| • RE: Social Networking querys | Bruce Douglas | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | Balazs Rauznitz | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | Mark Papadakis | 2 Feb |
| • RE: Social Networking querys | Dathan Pattishall | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | Bruce Douglas | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | Balazs Rauznitz | 2 Feb |
| • Re: Social Networking querys | listsql listsql | 2 Feb |
