MySQL released this a few weeks ago.
http://www.mysql.com/news-and-events/press-release/release_2004_27.html
As far as personal benchmarks, it's fast. Real fast. With a quad Xeon
(which was more expensive than the quad opteron) our master server had a
normal load of 2-3. With the the quad opteron it's less than .25.
Donny
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Abbott [mailto:brian.abbott@stripped]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:32 PM
> To: mysql@stripped; 'Donny Simonton'
> Cc: 'Miles Keaton'
> Subject: RE: best-performing CPU + platform for MySQL now? Opteron?
> OpenBSD? SuSE?
>
> Do you guys have metrics on this that you would be willing to share? We
> are looking at upgrading to the Opteron (from the Xeon) at the moment.
> Any information would be very helpful.
>
> Brian Abbott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:Jeremy@stripped]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:21 PM
> To: Donny Simonton
> Cc: mysql@stripped; 'Miles Keaton'
> Subject: Re: best-performing CPU + platform for MySQL now? Opteron?
> OpenBSD? SuSE?
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 03:05:07PM -0500, Donny Simonton wrote:
> >
> > I can verify that a quad opteron 2.2 runs about a million times better
>
> > than a quad xeon 3.06. The opteron can handle more than 3 gigs of
> > memory which is a 32 bit limitation. Right now in my quad opteron we
> > have 32 gigs of memory and MySQL is using 16.8 gigs of the memory.
> >
> > We run fedora core 2, with the rpm built by MySQL. We don't run
> > anything else any longer.
>
> And we've had good but limited experiences so far with 64 bit FreeBSD 5
> on amd64 (also a quad w/32GB).
>
> Jeremy
> --
> Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
> <Jeremy@stripped> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/
>
> [book] High Performance MySQL -- http://highperformancemysql.com/
>
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe:
> http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=1
>