| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | matt ryan | Date: | August 13 2004 7:26pm |
| Subject: | Re: Replace delayed locks table | ||
| View as plain text | |||
matt ryan wrote: > >> Replace does a delete followed by an insert. >> > Ahh, I'm testing innodb on our tables with this problem > Doh another problem innodb has no merge option, I have too much data, and the only way to deal with it, is partition the data and then tie it together with merge views. Unfortunatly innodb will not work for me :( Anybody know if SQL Server desktop supports what I need? I know oracle does, but the cost is an issue, maxdb costs too much too.
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Replace delayed locks table | matt ryan | 12 Aug |
| • Re: Replace delayed locks table | gerald_clark | 12 Aug |
| • Re: Replace delayed locks table | matt ryan | 13 Aug |
| • Re: Replace delayed locks table | SGreen | 12 Aug |
| • Re: Replace delayed locks table | gerald_clark | 13 Aug |
| • Re: Replace delayed locks table | matt ryan | 13 Aug |
| • Re: Replace delayed locks table | matt ryan | 13 Aug |
| • Re: Replace delayed locks table | matt ryan | 13 Aug |
| • Re: Replace delayed locks table | SGreen | 13 Aug |
| • Re: Replace delayed locks table | gerald_clark | 13 Aug |
