List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:matt ryan Date:August 13 2004 7:18pm
Subject:Re: Replace delayed locks table
View as plain text  
matt ryan wrote:

>
>> Replace does a delete followed by an insert.
>>
> Ahh, I'm testing innodb on our tables with this problem
>
I've switched to innodb but performance isnt very good

while the insert runs, here's what I get for performance

select count(*) from rondon;
1 row in .13 sec

select count(*) from rondon;
1 row in 21.88 sec

select count(*) from rondon;
1 row in 42.47 sec

select count(*) from rondon;
1 row in 1 min 47.69 sec

not sure why the first was so fast, the rest SUCK

Thread
Replace delayed locks tablematt ryan12 Aug
  • Re: Replace delayed locks tablegerald_clark12 Aug
    • Re: Replace delayed locks tablematt ryan13 Aug
  • Re: Replace delayed locks tableSGreen12 Aug
  • Re: Replace delayed locks tablegerald_clark13 Aug
    • Re: Replace delayed locks tablematt ryan13 Aug
      • Re: Replace delayed locks tablematt ryan13 Aug
      • Re: Replace delayed locks tablematt ryan13 Aug
        • Re: Replace delayed locks tableSGreen13 Aug
  • Re: Replace delayed locks tablegerald_clark13 Aug