| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Ruben | Date: | July 26 2004 5:30pm |
| Subject: | Re: why use MySql instead of Firebird or SQL Server express? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Mysql is easier to install than Firebird and runs in more Operative Systems than SQL Server. Steve Richter wrote: >In light of the licensing restrictions on using MySql in a commercial >package, why would MySql be prefered over Firebird or SQL Server 2005 >express edition. Both appear to be no charge to redistribute compared to the >$250 for MySql. > >http://firebird.sourceforge.net/ > >http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/sql/default.aspx > >thanks, > >Steve Richter > > > > >
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • why use MySql instead of Firebird or SQL Server express? | Steve Richter | 26 Jul |
| • Re: why use MySql instead of Firebird or SQL Server express? | Ruben | 26 Jul |
| • Re: why use MySql instead of Firebird or SQL Server express? | Mark Matthews | 26 Jul |
| • Re: why use MySql instead of Firebird or SQL Server express? | justin | 26 Jul |
| • Re: why use MySql instead of Firebird or SQL Server express? | Mark Matthews | 26 Jul |
| • Re: why use MySql instead of Firebird or SQL Server express? (long) | Martijn Tonies | 26 Jul |
| • Re: why use MySql instead of Firebird or SQL Server express? (long) | Mark Matthews | 26 Jul |
| • Re: why use MySql instead of Firebird or SQL Server express? (long) | Martijn Tonies | 27 Jul |
