| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | JFL | Date: | May 13 2004 10:06am |
| Subject: | Re: InnoDB filesystem | ||
| View as plain text | |||
>>I've been told that InnoDB on a raw partition is the fastest setup. > > Actually, you've been told that it's probably the fastest. Correct. Sorry :) > Check the InnoDB docs. They explain how to setup raw disk > partitions. You'll be using device names, not mount points. Thanks. I forgot to check the manual. >>Any other tips, pros and cons? > > Pros: performance and bypassing the filesystem cache. > > Cons: loss of transparency and limited backup options. What do you mean by transparency? Thanks for your help, Jacob
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • InnoDB filesystem | JFL | 13 May |
| • Re: InnoDB filesystem | Jeremy Zawodny | 13 May |
| • Re: InnoDB filesystem | JFL | 13 May |
| • Re: InnoDB filesystem | Dan Nelson | 13 May |
| • Re: InnoDB filesystem | Tim Cutts | 13 May |
| • RE: InnoDB filesystem | Dathan Vance Pattishall | 14 May |
| • Re: InnoDB filesystem | Jeremy Zawodny | 14 May |
| • RE: InnoDB filesystem | Dathan Vance Pattishall | 14 May |
| • Re: InnoDB filesystem | Tim Cutts | 14 May |
| • Re: InnoDB filesystem | Chris Nolan | 14 May |
| • Re: InnoDB filesystem | Jeremy Zawodny | 14 May |
