| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | robert_rowe | Date: | January 7 2004 11:17pm |
| Subject: | Re: Bet the Business | ||
| View as plain text | |||
I would have to agree with you. The kinds of applications you mentioned need every scrap of speed possible. All I was saying is that stored procedure use is a trade off of flexibility vs. performance. In many applications the flexibility is more important than the performance gain and that the gain will be minor in many kinds of applications.
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Bet the Business | Ian O'Rourke | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Daniel Kasak | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Jochem van Dieten | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | robert_rowe | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | ian.orourke | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Matt Davies | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Michael Bacarella | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | robert_rowe | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Ian O'Rourke | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Martijn Tonies | 6 Jan |
| • ..mysql question bank.. Needed.. | Amanullah | 7 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Mike | 7 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | ian.orourke | 7 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | robert_rowe | 7 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | robert_rowe | 7 Jan |
| • RE: Bet the Business | Dan Greene | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Udikarni | 7 Jan |
