| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Jochem van Dieten | Date: | January 6 2004 11:22am |
| Subject: | Re: Bet the Business | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Ian ORourke said: > > In the near future we face making a decision for a database backend, > and the logical choice for us is MSSQL as we have one server already > for Great Plains - but it would seem MySQL is much cheaper. Perhaps. But supporting 2 database servers sounds like the most expensive option to me, so the question is if you can completely replace MS SQL server. Jochem
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Bet the Business | Ian O'Rourke | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Daniel Kasak | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Jochem van Dieten | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | robert_rowe | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | ian.orourke | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Matt Davies | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Michael Bacarella | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | robert_rowe | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Ian O'Rourke | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Martijn Tonies | 6 Jan |
| • ..mysql question bank.. Needed.. | Amanullah | 7 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Mike | 7 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | ian.orourke | 7 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | robert_rowe | 7 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | robert_rowe | 7 Jan |
| • RE: Bet the Business | Dan Greene | 6 Jan |
| • Re: Bet the Business | Udikarni | 7 Jan |
