On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:01:55PM +0700, David Garamond wrote:
> Sven K?hler wrote:
> >I was very disappointed by Interbase/Firebird. It seemed to me like a
> >MS-Access: a database-engine that works on regular files
>
> Firebird seems simple, but it doesn't mean it's inferior or
> [intentionally] crippled like MS-Access. SQL server also works on
> "regular files" (db is stored as single files) and I believe FB is
> comparable to SQL server.
>
> In fact, I personally hate the fact that InnoDB can't work on "regular
> files" (db is not stored on single files or single directories).
That's already fixed in 4.1.1.
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<Jeremy@stripped> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/
