| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Chuck Gadd | Date: | December 3 2003 4:23am |
| Subject: | Re: Replication | ||
| View as plain text | |||
rubn ruvalcaba wrote: > I want to know how could solve the next replication scenario: > > I have a master. > I have 5 slaves. > > At start the slaves has a master snapshot. > > Now imagine slave 1, inserts a record. When it gets connected to the > lan, it must replicate it's changes to the master. No, a slave receives changes that occur at the master. That's why it's a slave. I suspect you want each machine to be a Master and a slave.
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Replication | rubn ruvalcaba | 3 Dec |
| • Re: Replication | Chuck Gadd | 3 Dec |
| • Re: Replication | Lloyd Kvam | 3 Dec |
| • group_concat() alternative for mysql < 4.1? | Victor SpĂ„ng Arthursson | 12 Jan |
| • Re: Replication | rubn ruvalcaba | 3 Dec |
| • Re: Replication | Stefan Kuhn | 3 Dec |
| • Re: Replication | rubn ruvalcaba | 5 Dec |
