List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Chuck Gadd Date:December 3 2003 4:23am
Subject:Re: Replication
View as plain text  
rubn ruvalcaba wrote:

> I want to know how could solve the next replication scenario:
> 
> I have a master.
> I have 5 slaves.
> 
> At start the slaves has a master snapshot.
> 
> Now imagine slave 1, inserts a record. When it gets connected to the 
> lan, it must replicate it's changes to the master.

No, a slave receives changes that occur at the master.   That's
why it's a slave.

I suspect you want each machine to be a Master and a slave.



Thread
Replicationrubn ruvalcaba3 Dec
  • Re: ReplicationChuck Gadd3 Dec
    • Re: ReplicationLloyd Kvam3 Dec
  • group_concat() alternative for mysql < 4.1?Victor SpĂ„ng Arthursson12 Jan
Re: Replicationrubn ruvalcaba3 Dec
  • Re: ReplicationStefan Kuhn3 Dec
Re: Replicationrubn ruvalcaba5 Dec