| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Thimble Smith | Date: | October 5 1999 10:00pm |
| Subject: | Re: Outputting Selects in Random Order | ||
| View as plain text | |||
At 14:50, 19991005, Hunter Hillegas wrote: >Is there any way from something like 'SELECT * FROM RECORDS' would output >the results in a random order, not by insertion order? Check the mailing list for "random", there's been several discussions on it. A select does *not* happen in insertion order by default. Please do not depend on that in your programs, because they will certainly break. You can not count on any order back from a SELECT unless you specify one with an ORDER BY clause! Tim
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • A question about indexes | Moz | 5 Oct |
| • Re: A question about indexes | Bob Kline | 5 Oct |
| • Outputting Selects in Random Order | Hunter Hillegas | 5 Oct |
| • Re: Outputting Selects in Random Order | Thimble Smith | 6 Oct |
| • Re: Outputting Selects in Random Order | Bob Kline | 6 Oct |
| • Re: Outputting Selects in Random Order | Scott Hess | 6 Oct |
| • Re: Outputting Selects in Random Order | Thimble Smith | 6 Oct |
| • Re: Outputting Selects in Random Order | Bob Kline | 6 Oct |
| • Re: Outputting Selects in Random Order | Hunter Hillegas | 6 Oct |
| • Re: Outputting Selects in Random Order | Bob Kline | 6 Oct |
| • Re: Outputting Selects in Random Order | Martin Ramsch | 7 Oct |
| • Re: Outputting Selects in Random Order | Hunter Hillegas | 6 Oct |
| • Re: A question about indexes | Mark Papadakis | 5 Oct |
| • Re: A question about indexes | Bob Kline | 6 Oct |
