| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Jeremy Zawodny | Date: | August 18 2003 6:19pm |
| Subject: | Re: Table locking... | ||
| View as plain text | |||
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 11:15:31AM -0700, jkelty@stripped wrote: > I could fix this if I changed the table type to InnoDB, correct? Yes. InnoDB uses a very different locking model. You'll get very good read/write concurrency with InnoDB. Jeremy -- Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo! <Jeremy@stripped> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/ MySQL 4.0.13: up 17 days, processed 869,578,443 queries (591/sec. avg)
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Table locking... | jkelty | 18 Aug |
| • RE: Table locking... | Dathan Vance Pattishall | 18 Aug |
| • Re: Table locking... | Dan Nelson | 18 Aug |
| • Re: Table locking... | Jeremy Zawodny | 18 Aug |
| • Re: Table locking... | jkelty | 18 Aug |
| • Re: Table locking... | Jeremy Zawodny | 18 Aug |
