List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Victoria Reznichenko Date:July 18 2003 4:28pm
Subject:Re: join query result difference between 3.23.49 and 4.0.13
View as plain text  
"Rudy Metzger" <rudy.metzger@stripped> wrote:
> Better ifnull(sum(amount_paid),0)

Yes, you are right.

> 
> Because if you add up a column which contains NULL and NOT NULL values,
> all NULL values are SKIPPED for the calculation. 
> 
> This implies that if the column ONLY contains NULL values, the result is
> NULL.
> 
> Would be great if MySQL could post a chart somewhere of how they treat
> NULL values in calculations. Until then, check the release notes for
> every release concerning NULLs. And also the known bugs/future releases.
> 
> 


-- 
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http://www.ensita.net/
   __  ___     ___ ____  __
  /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /    Victoria Reznichenko
 / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   Victoria.Reznichenko@stripped
/_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   MySQL AB / Ensita.net
       <___/   www.mysql.com




Thread
join query result difference between 3.23.49 and 4.0.13Doug Reese16 Jul
  • Re: join query result difference between 3.23.49 and 4.0.13Victoria Reznichenko17 Jul
RE: join query result difference between 3.23.49 and 4.0.13Rudy Metzger17 Jul
Re: join query result difference between 3.23.49 and 4.0.13Doug Reese17 Jul
  • Re: join query result difference between 3.23.49 and 4.0.13Victoria Reznichenko18 Jul
RE: join query result difference between 3.23.49 and 4.0.13Rudy Metzger18 Jul
  • Re: join query result difference between 3.23.49 and 4.0.13Victoria Reznichenko18 Jul