| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Mojtaba Faridzad | Date: | June 9 2003 5:40pm |
| Subject: | arrangement of fields in a table | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Hi, I need to define for example 100 fields in a table. 8 of them are more important and many queries just need these fields. Should I define them before the other fields in the table or it doesn't matter? Is accessing the the beginning fields faster than the other fields? thanks
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Fw: 2 questions about indexing and testing speed | Mojtaba Faridzad | 9 Jun |
| • arrangement of fields in a table | Mojtaba Faridzad | 9 Jun |
| • Re: arrangement of fields in a table | Jeremy Zawodny | 9 Jun |
| • Re: arrangement of fields in a table | Nils Valentin | 10 Jun |
| • Re: Fw: 2 questions about indexing and testing speed | Victoria Reznichenko | 10 Jun |
| • Re: Fw: 2 questions about indexing and testing speed | rich johnson | 10 Jun |
| • INT type | Mojtaba Faridzad | 10 Jun |
| • Re: INT type | Dan Nelson | 10 Jun |
| • RE: INT type | Mike Hillyer | 10 Jun |
| • Re: INT type | Mojtaba Faridzad | 10 Jun |
| • Re: INT type | Paul DuBois | 10 Jun |
| • Re: INT type | Dan Nelson | 10 Jun |
