On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Doug Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:41:01 -0400 (EDT), Matt Loschert wrote:
>
> >Interesting. I had never seen this page of the manual before. However,
> >you appear to be correct. I don't see an applicable reference there
> >either.
> >
> >I think I am going to re-post my message to the bugs list since no one has
> >shown me yet that this is definitely expected behavior.
> >
>
> Huh?!?
>
> Here are the first two sentences from Appendix A.5.7.
>
> <quote>
> floating-point numbers cause confusion sometimes, because these numbers
> are not stored as exact values inside computer architecture. What one
> can see on the screen usually is not the exact value of the number.
>
> Field types FLOAT, DOUBLE and DECIMAL are such.
> <end quote>
>
> Seems to me that's rather explicit that what you are seeing is expected behavior.
That may be the case, but I would assume (again, I guess incorrectly) that
on a given architecture, the following two values would be treated
identically. Is quoting really supposed to change the representation of
the number?
CREATE TABLE test1 (field1 decimal(12,2));
INSERT INTO test1 VALUES ('0.005');
INSERT INTO test1 VALUES ( 0.005 );
SELECT * FROM test1;
+--------+
| field1 |
+--------+
| 0.00 |
| 0.01 |
+--------+
2 rows in set (0.02 sec)
- Matt
--
Matt Loschert - Software Engineer | email: loschert@stripped |
ServInt Internet Services | web: http://www.servint.net/ |
McLean, Virginia USA | phone: (703) 847-1381 |