At 3:35 PM -0600 4/2/1999, Josh S. Gough wrote:
>Hmm...weird...well, check out this post from Monty for why i didn't
>think it was supposed to work that way:
>"I am just now working on the next ISAM version and this will NOT reuse
>auto_increment values. The maximum used value will be saved in the
>.ISM file header and can only be reset with isamchk."
>I guess I'm wondering whether that is implemented yet... I thought
>I saw another post that said auto_increment should never resuse the
>values, but I cant find it again...
It's not implemented yet.
Paul DuBois, paul@stripped
Northern League Chronicles: http://www.snake.net/nl/