| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Paul DuBois | Date: | March 13 2003 4:20pm |
| Subject: | Re: Datetime vs Unixtime | ||
| View as plain text | |||
At 10:34 -0500 3/13/03, Keith C. Ivey wrote: >I am curious why a DATE takes 3 bytes and a TIME takes 3 bytes, but a >DATETIME takes 8 bytes, even though TIME covers a much greater range >than the time part of a DATETIME, but that's just one of the >mysteries of MySQL that's probably not worth losing sleep over. I believe that to get that information you must sign a non-disclosure agreement. > >[Filter fodder: SQL]
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Datetime vs Unixtime | Jason Brothers | 13 Mar |
| • Re: Datetime vs Unixtime | Paul Chvostek | 13 Mar |
| • Re: Datetime vs Unixtime | Paul DuBois | 13 Mar |
| • Re: Datetime vs Unixtime | Keith C. Ivey | 13 Mar |
| • Re: Datetime vs Unixtime | Paul DuBois | 13 Mar |
| • Re: Datetime vs Unixtime | walt | 13 Mar |
| • Re: Datetime vs Unixtime | Paul DuBois | 13 Mar |
| • Re: Datetime vs Unixtime | Jason Brothers | 13 Mar |
| • Re: Datetime vs Unixtime | Keith C. Ivey | 13 Mar |
| • Re: Datetime vs Unixtime | Jason Brothers | 13 Mar |
| • Re: Datetime vs Unixtime | Keith C. Ivey | 13 Mar |
| • Using LOAD DATA IN FILE or SOURCE with MyODBC. | William Bailey | 25 Mar |
| • Re: Datetime vs Unixtime | Paul Chvostek | 13 Mar |
