On Fri, 1999-09-17 12:05:20 -0500, Gavin wrote:
> Would there be any benefit/interest to adding the 'where
> field=something' clause to the REPLACE syntax?
It's already possible by the means of
REPLACE INTO ... SELECT ...
(There's only the limitation that you can't REPLACE INTO the same
table you're SELECTing from.)
Or did I miss the point?
Martin Ramsch <m.ramsch@stripped> <URL: http://home.pages.de/~ramsch/ >
PGP KeyID=0xE8EF4F75 FiPr=52 44 5E F3 B0 B1 38 26 E4 EC 80 58 7B 31 3A D7