| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Daevid Vincent | Date: | March 6 2003 2:36am |
| Subject: | Foreign keys and being FIRST index | ||
| View as plain text | |||
http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/SEC457.html states that "there must be an index where the foreign key and the referenced key are listed as the FIRST columns." Will this restriction be lifted soon? It is incredibly frustrating. I don't see why they have to be indexes, and more importantly, I don't see why they have to be FIRST! Ugh.
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Foreign keys and being FIRST index | Daevid Vincent | 6 Mar |
| • Re: Foreign keys and being FIRST index | Dan Nelson | 6 Mar |
| • RE: Foreign keys and being FIRST index | Daevid Vincent | 6 Mar |
| • Re: Foreign keys and being FIRST index | Dan Nelson | 6 Mar |
| • RE: Foreign keys and being FIRST index | Keith C. Ivey | 6 Mar |
| • Multiple foreign keys? | Daevid Vincent | 8 Mar |
| • re: Multiple foreign keys? | Egor Egorov | 8 Mar |
| • Re: Foreign keys and being FIRST index | William R. Mussatto | 6 Mar |
