List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Jeremy Zawodny Date:January 3 2003 11:49pm
Subject:Re: Info: Using MySQL as Mutex
View as plain text  
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 11:10:38AM -0600, Dana Diederich wrote:
> Yup, MySQL works quite well as a lock server; we've been using it as such
> for years.

Yeah, do we.

> I would suggest looking at the get_lock() function specifically.  It's
> designed to do exactly what you're looking for, and it won't require
> knowledge of any tables or rows.

I thought so initially too, but locks from get_lock()/release_lock()
vanish when the connection vanishes.  We didn't want that.  It added
way to much complexity to our code, so we created a lock table and
went from there...
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny     |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<Jeremy@stripped>  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

MySQL 3.23.51: up 19 days, processed 679,216,889 queries (397/sec. avg)
Thread
Info: Using MySQL as MutexMichael T. Babcock3 Jan
RE: Info: Using MySQL as MutexDana Diederich3 Jan
  • Re: Info: Using MySQL as MutexJeremy Zawodny4 Jan