Hi,
The performance problem on his query was due to the missing index on join
columns.
However I was assuming using table1 INNER JOIN table2 ON condition would
have helped the optimiser to choose the tables on which it had to perform
the join.
Regards,
Jocelyn
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harald Fuchs" <lists-mysql@stripped>
To: <mysql@stripped>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: really slow query results --- SOLVED
> In article <20021219041930.GA54615@stripped>,
> Dan Nelson <dnelson@stripped> writes:
>
> > INNER JOIN and WHERE do the same thing:
>
> > * `INNER JOIN' and `,' (comma) are semantically equivalent. Both do
> > a full join between the tables used. Normally, you specify how the
> > tables should be linked in the WHERE condition.
>
> That's what I always thought, but this must be wrong when Joseph
> noticed a difference in performance. Any experts out there with
> comments on that?
>
>
> [Filter fodder: SQL query]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Before posting, please check:
> http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
> http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
>
> To request this thread, e-mail <mysql-thread127946@stripped>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail
<mysql-unsubscribe-joc=presence-pc.com@stripped>
> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
>
>
>
>
