List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Jeremy Zawodny Date:December 5 2002 5:09am
Subject:Re: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0
View as plain text  
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:18:26PM -0500, Adam Nelson wrote:
>
> Don't let this list fool you.  SQL Server is a very good product.
> It is far superior to Mysql in every way except cost and the fact
> that it doesn't run on unix.

This smells a lot like flaim bait on a MySQL list...

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny     |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<Jeremy@stripped>  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

MySQL 3.23.51: up 14 days, processed 440,492,778 queries (343/sec. avg)
Thread
Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Mike Ledet4 Dec
  • Re: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Nikolas Samios4 Dec
  • RE: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Adam Nelson4 Dec
  • RE: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Adam Nelson4 Dec
  • Re: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Mirek Novak5 Dec
RE: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Mike Ledet4 Dec
  • Re: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Michael T. Babcock5 Dec
RE: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Mike Ledet4 Dec
RE: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Mike Ledet4 Dec
  • RE: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Adam Nelson4 Dec
    • Re: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Jeremy Zawodny5 Dec
RE: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Mike Ledet4 Dec
  • RE: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Adam Nelson4 Dec
RE: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Mike Ledet4 Dec
RE: Slow performance using 3.23 on RH 8.0Jan Steinman5 Dec