| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Jeremy Zawodny | Date: | November 12 2002 3:31am |
| Subject: | Re: How stable is MySQL 4.x vs 3.23.x? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:11:26AM +0800, Jaime Teng wrote: > Hi, > > How stable is the new MySQL 4.x? > > I've read some really nice and powerful stuffs with MySQL 4. > x and surely like to use them. > > Is this still in the 'use at your own risk' stage? > or is it stable enough for use already? We've been running it on all our slaves quite happily for months now. Just haven't had the chance to take down the master and upgrade it. Maybe when it hits 4 billion queries. :-) Jeremy -- Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo! <Jeremy@stripped> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/ MySQL 3.23.51: up 97 days, processed 2,051,280,064 queries (242/sec. avg)
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Problems with simple(?) query | James Dyer | 11 Nov |
| • Re: Problems with simple(?) query | Dan Nelson | 11 Nov |
| • RE: Problems with simple(?) query | Peter Grigor | 11 Nov |
| • Re: Problems with simple(?) query | Keith C. Ivey | 11 Nov |
| • Re: Problems with simple(?) query | Michael T. Babcock | 11 Nov |
| • Re: Problems with simple(?) query | John Ragan | 12 Nov |
| • How stable is MySQL 4.x vs 3.23.x? | Jaime Teng | 12 Nov |
| • Re: How stable is MySQL 4.x vs 3.23.x? | Jeremy Zawodny | 12 Nov |
| • RE: Problems with simple(?) query | Arthur Fuller | 18 Nov |
| • RE: How stable is MySQL 4.x vs 3.23.x? | Kelly W [PCS] Black | 12 Nov |