On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 09:29:52PM +1100, Greg Matthews wrote:
> I'm not a C/C++ coder so couldn't really help unless a binary was
> At the same time, I understand that you'd be wasting your time building
> binaries unless you were happy that the code was at a certain level of
> completion (with regard to 4.1 specific features).
Actually, I alredy build binaries of 3.23, 4.0, and 4.1 nightly on
Linux and FreeBSD using MySQL AB's development code. I've automated
it, so it takes none of my time now.
I just don't generally share them outside of work. :-)
> Your call. If a 4.1 binary was available then I'd spend time testing
> it with a J2EE app under JBoss on Windows XP -- otherwise i'll just
> have to wait.
Err, Windows binaries are a whole different matter. I don't have the
tools or knowledge necessary to build 'em. Perhaps someone else on
the list does...
Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<Jeremy@stripped> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/
MySQL 3.23.51: up 96 days, processed 2,007,837,623 queries (241/sec. avg)