| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Ed Carp | Date: | October 7 2002 7:02am |
| Subject: | RE: RES: Performance Question. | ||
| View as plain text | |||
> Don't forget that MySQL is the fastest thing on the planet for your (and mine) > kind of simple query and insert/updates. We measured 12 times faster > performance in MySQL than Oracle in one part of our application, and I > strongly believe that in the MySQL case the Java program overhead became > significant, but that was never measured. Actually, the fastest is probably a binary search against a file of sorted, fixed-length records, but that's a subject for another post ;)
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Performance Question. | Robert H.R. Restad | 6 Oct |
| • RE: Performance Question. | Peter Lovatt | 7 Oct |
| • RE: Performance Question. | Ed Carp | 7 Oct |
| • RE: Performance Question. | Peter Lovatt | 7 Oct |
| • RES: Performance Question. | Robert H.R. Restad | 7 Oct |
| • RE: Performance Question. | Ed Carp | 7 Oct |
| • RE: Performance Question. | Ed Carp | 7 Oct |
| • RES: Performance Question. | Robert H.R. Restad | 7 Oct |
| • Re: RES: Performance Question. | Niclas Hedhman | 7 Oct |
| • RE: RES: Performance Question. | Ed Carp | 7 Oct |
