| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Paul DuBois | Date: | July 28 2002 10:56pm |
| Subject: | Re: Penalty for non-null defaults ? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
At 14:34 -0700 7/28/02, Charlie wrote: >Is there any storage / performance penalty for specifying '' or 0 as default >values, as opposed to allowing null's in the table structure? NULL values take less storage space. (One bit per NULL value in a row, if I remember correctly). > >sql, query > >Thanks, >Charlie
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Penalty for non-null defaults ? | Charlie | 29 Jul |
| • Re: Penalty for non-null defaults ? | Paul DuBois | 29 Jul |
| • Re: Penalty for non-null defaults ? | Keith C. Ivey | 30 Jul |
| • Re: Penalty for non-null defaults ? | Jeremy Zawodny | 30 Jul |
