List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Jeremy Zawodny Date:May 21 2002 4:44am
Subject:Re: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexes
View as plain text  
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 11:41:49AM +0300, Michael Widenius wrote:

[snip]

> In a case like this (where so many rows are covered by the index)
> it's not self evident that a table scan is not faster than an index
> scan.
> 
> Especially with many users using the key cache at the same time, a
> table scan is likely to use less resources from the system.
x
That reminds me.  A while back (9 months, maybe), I seem to remember
you discussion a re-write of the key cache so that it would use a more
locking strategy.

Is that supposed to happen in 4.0.x?  I don't recall having seen a
commit that affected the key cache yet.

Thanks!

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny     |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<Jeremy@stripped>  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/
Thread
MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesMyk Melez22 Apr
  • Re: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesMyk Melez22 Apr
  • Re: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesMyk Melez24 Apr
Re: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesSteven Roussey23 Apr
  • Re: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesJohn Birrell23 Apr
  • Re: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesMyk Melez24 Apr
    • RE: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesSteven Roussey24 Apr
      • Re: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesMyk Melez24 Apr
        • Re: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesMichael Widenius15 May
      • Re: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesMyk Melez16 May
        • Re: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesMichael Widenius17 May
          • Re: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesJeremy Zawodny21 May
            • Re: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesMichael Widenius21 May
      • Re: MySQL 3.23.44 not using indexesLuciano Barcaro21 May