From: Tauren Mills Date: March 26 1999 9:43am Subject: RE: Length of Database name field inconsistent List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/1005 Message-Id: <000b01be776d$2438dec0$1ad7a2d1@easystreet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I just tried to upgraded my to 3.22.20 on my RedHat 5.2 linux installation from 3.22.13. Here is what happened: [root@s1 packages]# rpm -Uvh MySQL-3.22.20a-1.i386.rpm /usr/bin/mysqlbug conflicts with file from MySQL-client-3.22.13-beta-1 error: MySQL-3.22.20a-1.i386.rpm cannot be installed [root@s1 packages]# rpm -Uvh MySQL-client-3.22.20a-1.i386.rpm /usr/bin/mysqlbug conflicts with file from MySQL-3.22.13-beta-1 error: MySQL-client-3.22.20a-1.i386.rpm cannot be installed So I did this: [root@s1 packages]# rpm -Uvhi --replacefiles MySQL-client-3.22.20a-1.i386.rpm [root@s1 packages]# rpm -Uvh MySQL-3.22.20a-1.i386.rpm And things seemed to install properly. BUT... The mysql database itself didn't get changed. The database name field is still 32 characters, not 64. Do I need to uninstall MySQL and then reinstall it to really upgrade? If so, what is the easiest way to preserve the users/hosts/databases in the mysql tables? Should I just alter the tables manually? Or are there other field definitions that have changed too? Thanks, Tauren > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Widenius [mailto:monty@stripped] > Sent: Sunday, March 21, 1999 9:03 AM > To: Tauren Mills > Cc: Paul DuBois > Subject: RE: Length of Database name field inconsistent > > > >>>>> "Tauren" == Tauren Mills writes: > > Tauren> Hmmm. Looks like I need to upgrade this server. I've > got 3.22.14-gamma > Tauren> running on my Solaris box, but I haven't upgraded this > Linux box yet. Here > Tauren> is the version info: > > > > Yes, an upgrade will extend the database name from 32 to 64 > characters! > > Regards, > Monty >