On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, Dittmar, Daniel wrote something like this:
> > As traffic continues to pick up on this list we are seeing
> > more questions
> > about the management tools and about interfaces (like PHP).
> > Perhaps it
> > might be time for a list split? Normally I am against list
> > splits, but on
> > higher trafficked lists with distinct boundary lines its nice
> > as it helps
> > sort incoming mail. Just a thought question. Any opinions?
>
> - it is not always clear if a problem is with the tool/interface or with the kernel,
> so I don't think the categories are really that clearly cut
> - I noticed in other mailing lists that quite a bit of mails go to the wrong list
> anyway
> - accessing the mailing list through the news interface
> news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.sapdb.general is a great way to make it less
> interruptive, especially when the number of messages goes up
I also think that the former proposed list of lists is not helpful, since
most of us will have to do with most of those lists anyway. The only thing I
propose would be a separate list for those, who *compile* sapdb or even make
changes to the source code of sapdb, since this is yields really a
completely other category of problems...
> But of course, if there is a general demand for more focused lists, we will create
> them.
>
> Daniel Dittmar
>
>
--
Mathias .'\ /.
.'.-.-'.-..
..._: .-. .-. :_...
.' '-.(o ) (o ).-' .
: _ _ _~(_)~_ _ _ :
: /: ' .-=_ _=-. ;\ :
: :|-.._ ' _..-|: :
: :| |:-:-.-:-:'| |:' :
. .| | | | | | |.' .'
. -:_| | |_:-' .'
-._ ` _.-'
-------''
