List:MaxDB« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Hauke Fath Date:February 28 2003 1:47pm
Subject:Re: Is the Log writer lazy by default?
View as plain text  
"Tobias Oberstein" <Tobias.Oberstein@stripped> wrote:

> For HD2, which runs at 7200 rpms I expected an upper limit of
> 7200/60=120 synchronous writes. Oracle does as expected, whereas
> SAP DB does much more: over 600 writes/s. This can't be the case -
> something goes wrong here. Don't say I should be lucky to have as
> much performance;) I'd like to have it "durable" too.

On many IDE drives, you cannot disable the write-back cache.

"You get what you pay for".

        hauke

-- 
         Hauke Fath                             /~\    The ASCII
tangro software components GmbH                 \ / Ribbon Campaign
     D-69115 Heidelberg                          X      Against
 Ruf +49-6221-13336-0, Fax -21                  / \   HTML Email!

Thread
Is the Log writer lazy by default?Tobias Oberstein22 Feb
  • Re: Is the Log writer lazy by default?Sven Köhler22 Feb
  • raw devices & async i/oArne Gehlhaar24 Feb
    • Re: raw devices & async i/oSven Köhler24 Feb
  • Re: Is the Log writer lazy by default?(Hauke Fath)25 Feb
RE: Is the Log writer lazy by default?Martin Brunzema24 Feb
RE: raw devices & async i/oMarkus Hermeskeil Döhr24 Feb
  • Re: raw devices & async i/oSven Köhler24 Feb
RE: raw devices & async i/oMarkus Hermeskeil Döhr24 Feb
  • Re: raw devices & async i/oSven Köhler24 Feb
RE: raw devices & async i/oMarkus Hermeskeil Döhr24 Feb
  • Re: raw devices & async i/oArne Gehlhaar26 Feb
RE: Is the Log writer lazy by default?Tobias Oberstein28 Feb
RE: Is the Log writer lazy by default?Tobias Oberstein28 Feb
  • Re: Is the Log writer lazy by default?(Hauke Fath)28 Feb
RE: Is the Log writer lazy by default?Martin Brunzema10 Mar